https://horridreceptionwikis.miraheze.org/wiki/Angrybirdsfan They restored the article on me, and the claim its "Criticism," but its not. Its concidered pure harassment.
I'm being harrassed again
There is nothing else to say about this topic.
Bruh, just stop! Get over it and move on. Stop complaining about us.
Agreed with Mr 222.
I told you, that this is beyond my authority, that you should stop being so obsessed with it. Do you even know how to listen?! Or are you just here to test my patience?!
I'm an admin of this site, I'm not some lackey you can summon anytime. Either get a hold of yourself, or find out what it's like to be on the receiving end of the ban hammer. GET IT?!
Here we go again.
I also saw that you aren't completely innocent. Anyway, if you were blocked because you were considered immature, behaving like this won't make any good for you. You should instead try to appear more responsible and avoiding spreading these threads everywhere.
I think he left also because of these type of things happening more often.
You know, I must agree that Unnamedgoon left for these reasons.
I think these annoying threads were just the final blow, he basically wrote that life is a torture, something must have happened in his life that turned him away from the life on wikias.
Yeah, pretty much. He does have a YouTube account.
What's worse is that he made me believe he was going to return sooner or later and later he denied it. Thank you for everything, bunch of bigoted morons known as FANDOM staff.
Man, I rarely see you become so pissed. FANDOM staff, you can all eat a bowl of FUCK! Assholians!
Try to act like it dont exist.
You are right but at times it is hard.
Hey, Angry. That page deserved to be created because you are such a pain in the butt who spreads rumors about me and other innocent users, just because we criticized you. Yet, when a page was made about you, you whine down and complained about it.
He even said in a reddit post to those who have a page there its just criticism. But he acts like its a hate page.
Mason thief is right. You aren’t innocent.
Now that I think of it, Angrybirdsfanonmiraheze was blocked ad infinitum by Vicious187.
Vicious has been considering that for a very long time, and so have I. Back in the days on FANDOM we're already fed up with Angrybirdsfanonmiraheze's tendency to stir up drama that he couldn't handle. I suppose this is the final straw for him.
I think he deserved that page.
I found he finally got banned for infinite for harassment and intimidating behavior.
Should game engines like Unity be on Crappygames wiki?
This engine is not bad, just filled with shitty shovelware games made in basement
I ask because many say Unity is a crappy game engine thanks to shovelware/poor optimization or no?
Or are their better crappy game engines worthy of a wiki entry?
Nah, a crappy engines wiki is too redundant. Make a Unity page on your sandbox and tell me when it's done. Then we'll review it and accept it if it's good enough.
It has to have more reasons than those two, BTW. The first reason IMO is kinda invalid. You can't call something bad because it's used by lousy people. It's like calling the Toyota Prius bad based solely on the fact that some Prius drivers tend to be obnoxious.
It because many people say Unity is a bad game engine like Jim Sterling.
I think we should.
Why should Unity get a crappygames wiki page?
Sorry, i thought he said about Unity games.
It the game engine not specific games.
Unity is a good engine, its just most poor quality mobile games invading the engine.
That why it has a bad rep.
Unity is basically used for practicing video game programming. It's common in schools because it's visual and easy to use and access. It's just people abusing it.
Worse ones include NightShade (Used to make WarZ and Wild West Online) and Bethesda's Creation Engine?
So both NightShade and Creation Engine are better candidates for Crappygames wiki game engines then Unity?
Lazy cash grabbers abusing an engine to make shovelware is not a fault of the engine, it's the fault of the lazy cash grabbers.
It just Jim Sterling/DXFan619 loves to say the Unity is a crappy engine because of shovelware.
TyrantRex is right, Unity3d and other game engines aren't to be blamed for the quality of the games that were built using it.
The best choice is to mention the bad use developers make of this engine in the shovelware in video games page.
True, but people like Jim Sterling/DXFan619 like to rip on the engine.
Okay, but saying something is bad because it was used to create a bad thing doesn't make much sense. If I use a high quality sheet of paper to write someone a blackmail letter, it is my fault and not the paper's fault.
As I've already said, there's has to have more reasons than those two if Unity is to appear on this wiki. Especially when the second reason is rather invalid.
Well, Jim Sterling might be popular, but he isn't exactly always the voice of reason.
But since you guys are against it, we're gonna take Masson's route.
So no game engine is worthy of a crappy games wiki page then?
There might well be one. But Unity isn't it. If the developers of Cuphead were able to use Unity to make there game, I think that disqualifies it as a "bad engine".
Anyways, NightShade, Creation Engine and Telltale Tool are all better crappy games wiki game engine candidates then Unity?
A game engine must really be broken to be on this wiki, it shouldn't work properly to qualify.
Can not think of a single engine worthy of it?
Me neither, that was the point of what I was trying to suggest.
Creation Engine and Telltale Tool were both perfectly good engines for when they were first introduced, it was when the developers tried to force them to do stuff they weren't originally designed for that things went horribly wrong.
Nightshade might be a different story, but I can't seem to find out much about the actual engine.
What do you mean for Creation Engine and Telltale Tool tried to force them to do stuff they weren't originally designed for?
The reason Unity has a bes rep is because of all the shovelware, mainly because it is free to use, many popular indie games like SuperHot were actually made with Unity.
So it the fault of shovelware not the engine right?
Should we have a page for the non-Japanese version of Tokyo Mirage Sessions #FE/Encore Switch?
Inspired by the recent Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas (Japanese Version) page, I think this game is worthy of the same treatment because of the heavy censorship and review bombing: https://www.metacritic.com/game/switch/tokyo-mirage-sessions-fe-encore/user-reviews?
If any of you guys agree/disagree let me know?
Should this be added into the Google Stadia page?
For everything but Google Stadia game list as their are more games skipping Stadia then games on the platform itself: https://www.reddit.com/r/Stadia/comments/dye2ri/for_everything_but_google_stadia/, heck it even worse then Wii U for PS3/Xbox 360 games no joke: https://web.archive.org/web/20170702041734/http://www.ign.com/wikis/wii-u/Games_for_Everything_but_Wii_U
If you guys say yes, I am going to post it into the Google Stadia page ok?
Should we have Censored Gaming get a crappy games wiki page?
I ask because you guys did one on One Angry Gamer, and the same audience that love One Angry Gamer goes very hand and hand with Censored Gaming on YouTube/Facebook/Twitter/Reddit here are the links: https://twitter.com/CensoredGaming_/with_replies?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor and https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCFItIX8SIs4zqhJCHpbeV1A, https://www.reddit.com/r/CensoredGaming/ and https://www.facebook.com/CensoredGaming/
Do you guys want it or no?
Of course if you have valid reasons, go ahead. Me personally, I'd be interested in what you have to offer
I could, but i am not the best writer, more of a researcher?
Better on Awesome Games Wiki instead. (No offense)
Might be better their as well.
Should we keep or remove the Bloodstained: Ritual of the Night Switch version page?
Pages aren't removed only because a part of the reception likes the game, therefore this thread has no real use.
I ask because some dumb people are defending this terrible port.: https://videogamecritic.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=202512&t=17915&start=20 and https://videogamecritic.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=202512&t=17915&start=40 and https://videogamecritic.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=39461&t=18194 keep or remove, your guy's vote?
If you guys mostly say yes, we will try to remove it, if it mostly says no, the page stays?
Do you think this review of the Crappy Switch port of Bloodstained: Ritual of the Night is way too high and generous.
Because it gave the worst version a super high grade that should have been a D range but that just me and Crappy Games Wiki?
Review link: videogamecritic.com/switcham.htm?e=86357#rev5215
Should we have a niche gamer comunity wiki page?
I ask as that community can get downright toxic and mean and elistes, especially on censorship or attacking mainstream games, etc?
Yes or no?
Looks to me that the page is more fitting for the Toxic Fandoms & Hatedoms Wiki, unless the community has a widespread bad reputation like the "PC master race" community.
We once had a Toxic fandoms page but got deleted because it wasn't factual.
Ok did not know that or see that thanks for the info
Should we have a Nintendo downfall in the wake of this news or no?
Or do you think I am taking things to seriously?
No. That's would be a complete paranoid overreaction.
Sorry I had a rough day yesterday and took things to seriously sorry.
In my opinion haters and elites are much worse then fanboys as they are almost the same people sometimes.
Haters already are much worse than fandoms, for example the Sonic hatedom.
In a way yes.
Some characters wearing so little clothing that they're almost naked being given more clothing. The haters freak out and yell "HOW DARE YOU CENSORSHIP!!!!!!" with pitchforks and torches. People with common sense say "who cares".
Most people care more about things outside of gameplay these days.
Oh please, as long as they have Shigeru Miyamoto, I don't see any downfall for Nintendo.
i believe is more due to lazyness than censorship
In some ways yes, they ported the Western version and called it a day.
"Downfall" is also way too much of a generic buzzword, typical in clickbait "doom & gloom" rants.
We all know Nintendo is prone to making completely boneheaded tone deaf decisions from time to time, that's been a thing since the 80s, but they also still make quality games and are one of the better AAA publishers these days.
I blame the wiki community for the company downfall term category. And true Nintendo has always done boneheaded tone deaf decisions from time to time, so it nothing new. And true it quality games that matter as people focus more on things outside of gameplay.
Nintendo hasn't pulled a Fallout 76, I'd say they're still good, just woefully out of touch with certain things, I'd say.
True and thank god no Fallout 76 style game.
Nintendo still making good games and consoles, also they're don't milk their mascot Mario.
Unlike Sega, which they're ruined their repuation with mishandling the console releases, milking their mascot Sonic to death (though they're stopped milking but still too little too late).
That was Atlus who is the same company and made the same censor as Persona series.
Changes like this are made all the time whenever a game that was originally released in Japan gets shipped overseas. I kind of see it as an overreaction.
THe internet overreacts about every thing, yelling "censorship!" and "sjw conspirancy!" over the smallest of things is becoming more and more common.
People still overreact a simple thing anyway.
There's no way to stop it.
One negative thing doesn't change a whole company. If we put a downfall of Nintendo article on the wiki, it would be like the GameFreak article which was on here.
The GameFreak page was nothing but a hate bandwagoner ranting about the tinfoil hat conspirancy theories over the whole national dex thing which in itself was blown waaaaaaaaaay out of proportion.
People love to blow things out of proportion, also should a crappy games wiki page on Censored Gaming YouTube work or no?
Don't know anything about that.
YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCFItIX8SIs4zqhJCHpbeV1A
Actually, someone ready tried adding a Nintendo downfall Category but it got deleted. There weren't even any pages that used it.
LOL, did not know that.
Censorship was quite common in the NES and SNES era. And if that didn't stop me from regarding the SNES as my all time favorite console, this certainly won't affect my love for Nintendo.
Exactly and should a crappy games wiki page on Censored Gaming YouTube work or no?
The negative saga continues: https://nintendosoup.com/tokyo-mirage-sessions-fe-becomes-no-1-bestselling-wii-u-game-on-amazon-japan-after-censorship-fiasco/, at the rate thing are going it maybe can affect the Switch version if the negative backslash gets out of hand.
Your efforts are appreciated, Nintendo, but wouldn't it be better to NOT censor the game in the first place?!
The irony here is that a couple of months ago when they spoke out against Sony for censoring fanservice games, they said they wouldn't do the same, but here we are. Hypocrite much Nintendo? Probably done just to boost Switch sales since people complained about switching to other platforms. Kind of a waste of money if you ask me.
Nintendo made a mistake. They didn't want to censor it.
Hope the backslash gets big enough like the upcoming Sonic movie to help fix the issues.
You don't want that. The Sonic movie was an anomaly, and these online backlashes are getting out of hand.
But then again their was the Xbox One launch issues during E3, the Mass Effect 3 ending controversy, the PlayStation Cross Play/Cross Progresion blocking in multi console games prior to late 2019. One thing they all had in common is huge fandom backlashes that the gamers/customers got there whish after it becomes apparent to the companies. So if Tokyo Mirage Sessions™ #FE Encore Switch gets the same backlash about the censorship and/or the sales suffer worldwide, something can happen. But only time will tell.
I now hate this F****** The Video Game Critic website now and want to be a Crappy Games Wiki page now!
Why you may ask, It because I now hate the site based on how the critic hates the 8th Gen with a passion based on these F****** s**** review scores as followed: Super Smash Bros. for Wii U (gave the inferior 3DS version a high grade despite the Wii U version being better.), Splatoon, Super Mario Maker, The Wonderful 101, NES Remix Pack, Sunset Overdrive, Soulcalibur VI and Tekken 7 (all got lower scores then the god awful Sonic Boom: Rise of Lyric game WTF!), Bloodborne (same thing), The King of Fighters XIV (the incomplete mess Street Fighter V getting a higher score blows my mind!) Resident Evil 7 Biohazard (see what I mean about Dave the Video Game critic not being crazy about the 8th gen is with scores like this.) God of War 2018 (same thing as well). And also two other game grades that make my blood boil are the not so great Yooka-Laylee a B- when it deserves a C-/D+ range as many people hate it guts like Jim Sterling. And the god awful Switch port of Bloodstained: Ritual of the Night (B+ for a garbage version that should have gotten a D range especially that port, if it was PS4 and Xbox One the B+ score would have been right on target, but nope had to settle with the worst version just make my blood boil.) and gave Curse of the Moon a B- when that is more B+ worthy considering the port of Ritual of the Night is hot garbage. And now I want his website to be reviewed bombed/a Crappy Games Wiki
Stop acting like a fucking 2 years old! You're better than that.
The situation is resolved, this post you replied to is now outdated.
If anyone want to review bomb the website and make a Crappy Games Wiki page now, please respond as I want my revenge!
And the website?
Well, sorry but i couldn't find anything bad other than the page layout.
Chill out, man. Link, please.
You're very sensitive as hell, you know that right?
I really think a particular user of this wiki will say you are overreacting if he notices this topic.
Also the wikis can't tolerate external sites bombing and users who participate in this kind of actions are blocked indefinitely.
Plus, Masson, you might think of permanently blocking Sonicx9us for this appallingly toxic behavior. That's simply unacceptable in the slightest.
He understood why he was wrong, there is no need to block him.
Thanks, because now I am banned from the Video Game Critic forums for acting immature which is all my fault. Would love to return to the forums or maybe I need a break from the internet.
I am sorry to hear that, here you had a second chance because we are very understanding but VideoGameCritic's forum is very no-nonsense about banning users who write flaming posts and cause troubles.
I know, and what do you mean about the VideoGameCritic's forum is very no-nonsense about banning users who write flaming posts and cause troubles. If you want to help me get back in the forums, you can email at: firstname.lastname@example.org or the Contact a Board Administrator: https://videogamecritic.com/forums/memberlist.php?mode=contactadmin
And BTW, my user name is Sonicx9 just like here without the US part. Hope that helps.
I mean they keep their forums very clean and remove everything bad users may write there. I don't know if they would listen to third parties appealing a block.
He's already considering it. Again, we have banned people over inserting overly personal opinions in pages before.
And for once he would be right. Who cares if Thevideogamecritic has unique opinions on video games, that is not a valid reason to include a page about him here. Surely I do not blame him for not holding video games from the eight generation in high regard.
Well, everyone has their opinions. I say we only add them when these reviews are the result of bribery, irrelevant reasons (i.e. ID politics or fanboying) or sheer incompetence (i.e. DarksydePhil)
Indeed! Opinions are like butts, everyone has his own ones!
Also the site is already on Awesome Games Wiki.
Did not know that thanks.
This is considered brigading, and is not acceptable at the slightest. Don't try this in the future. We don't want to descend to lowly SJW or fanboy/girl tactics.