This wiki has been closed following a Request for Comments. Please see this page for more information.

User talk:ThePCGamer

Jump to navigation Jump to search

About this board

Not editable

Summary by ThePCGamer

Leave me alone with your unsourced garbage.

Money12123 (talkcontribs)

The page is still unsourced. It doesn't matter if "no one cares about it," that doesn't mean the tag should be removed. It still needs sources.

ThePCGamer (talkcontribs)

The wiki did not had to source things back in the past, even if they DID tell the truth, so why it does have to now? You are also not an admin and stop making things difficult to find, since some sources could be way too hard to find or could be lost completely, so deal with it.

Money12123 (talkcontribs)
  1. It doesn't have to, but it should because it's important to use sources to prove claims.
  2. If sources can't be found, then the claim can't be proven and therefore may be untrue, so it shouldn't be on the article at all.
ThePCGamer (talkcontribs)

You don't even run this wiki, so it's either an admin's decision to remove that tab or a user for a reason. Stop annoying me with your garbage that I don't even care about.

Allistayrian (talkcontribs)

"I've heard that DarkMatterMan said that it can be gone from this wiki and belong on AGW."

— Your deletion log



Can you provide proof of that? The page was removed multiple times and some time ago revived by me thanks to the poll, and DarkMatterMan himself allowed me to do so. —Allistayrian (💬) 16:06, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

ThePCGamer (talkcontribs)

I got that message on Discord, saying that it can be on AGW, but it might not be done today

Allistayrian (talkcontribs)

This should be announced on this wiki as Discord is not exactly a reliable evidence for making final decisions.

DarkMatterMan4500 (talkcontribs)

I also talked with a certain user (that I won't bother to name again) about this, and when I looked at the critic scores, it was pretty positive. I didn't want it deleted just yet without a discussion on-wiki. --DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 16:14, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Allistayrian (talkcontribs)

I recommend to refer to the article about corruption in game journalism first. Some positively rated games are not always good, which can sometimes make journalists unreliable. The game was not well received by the majority of content creators on YouTube, being the second important source of the game's reception. Critic reviews are not the only condition.

About the Outfit7 sandbox page

2
Money12123 (talkcontribs)

I now understand I should just wait, but I just want to say, I don't think that the apps actually receive bad reception, and if they do, I would like evidence. That said, the reasons are either biased, unexplained or untrue, so I don't think it's fair to put it on the wiki.

ThePCGamer (talkcontribs)

Evidence might appear soon on this sandbox. Removing those reasons will still count as a revertion.

MarioMario456 (talkcontribs)

I reverted your edits there because the game does not have enough redeeming qualities to be considered average. Don't revert without discussion.

ThePCGamer (talkcontribs)

k.

A cheeseburger for you!

1
DarkMatterMan4500 (talkcontribs)
There are no older topics