User talk:MarioMario456

So, zusar vasar page has been deleted for weak pointers reason, but i'm sure to be fix this page and recreation by me.

This user (MarioMario456) is retired.

I created the unblock template, due to the blocked user to request an unblock. If the block user requested, if decline use {{unblock reviewed}}, if accept use {{Unblocked}}.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Wfwpdvs8o77vt053 (block log • active blocks • central auth (for registered users) • global blocks (for IP users) • contribs • deleted contribs • change block settings • unblock • filter log)

---

Request reason:

See above.

Accept reason:

Unblocked per above. ~~~~

---

Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request.

thats right

Nice :)

I'm sorry, but when did this apparent rule become a thing? I don't ever remember seeing this discussed.

You shouldn't cross-wiki block an user for behavior on a single wiki, you know. Stuff like vandalism-only accounts, trolls and obvious sockpuppets should be, though.

Ok. I'm still used to the way the old admins blocked users, which is why I asked.

This is what I mean:

The EAS font

Yes idiot but it's not installed so it's using a fallback font

1. Thank you.

Hello. Could I please get the permission to create articles ? Edit : Sorry, wrong Wiki.

Instead of crying like a little brat, you should realize that these pages were deleted long ago, where the quality control was too harsh, only I recently restored them. In this matter, you should send him a private message, instead of creating an unnecessary topic again in a row.

We now hate how you delete the page with "generic/underdetailed" pointers, which is normal since it's usually done by beginners. Please restore Asphalt Street Storm Racing and Telltale Games pages. We will not rest until you fix the mistake. No more deleting "poor quality" pages. Please.

Ideally they can be moved to the creating user's sandbox for improvement.

I have an idea: maybe give people a week to fix the article before it's moved to the creator's sandbox or deleted (if the creator is inactive). Speaking of this, only diarrhea shit is going to be deleted.

Can you edit my user page to say “This user has retired and is doing better things with his life”, please? I can’t stand this wiki and I rather would care about Dramatica and TCRF than being here.

Do the same for the other wikis as well.

Example of Bluba's spam talk page posts.

I need you to make an announcement telling people to bump up the page count on Dreadful Literature Wiki and Wonderful Literature Wiki to 40 pages so that the main pages for those wikis can be redesigned.

Also Delightful Music & Songs Wiki and Horrible Music & Songs Wiki both have over 49 pages so once both wikis have their banners and you adopt HM&SW then the main pages for those wikis can be redesigned, and then after all of that is done we can rename the wiki URLs.

Example of Bluba's spam talk page posts.

Has any progress been made on your adoption of Horrible Music & Songs Wiki? The discussion on the talk page of the main page of HM&SW seems to have come to a halt. Have you requested an adoption to Stewards on Requests for adoption? If not, please do so soon.

I notified the Stewards.

Well, Dmehus did say he was going to get around to closing it down, (as in voting, so nobody gets confused) and it's good that you provided proof to him on Meta. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 10:20, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

Ok.

Let us know when the wiki's fully adopted!

Example of Bluba's spam talk page posts

@MarioMario456 I have a few things I need to talk to you about, since you are in charge of the rebrand now.

1. I know you said that biased pages would be deleted. Does that mean that the pages with mixed to negative reception that I have brought up in the past (The Lego Ninjago Movie, Star Trek The Motion Picture, The Black Cauldron, etc.) will be deleted? And we can talk about Prehibernation Week another time.
2. Since you are in charge of the rebrand now, I need you to do me a favor. Can you add a notice in MediaWiki:Sitenotice on every Qualitipedia wiki to update the sandboxes for the main page redesigns for Magnificent Literature Wiki and Delightful Music & Songs Wiki. Here are the links for both sandboxes:
   • User:Funny/sandbox (Magnificent Literature Wiki)
   • User:MarioMario456/sandbox (Delightful Music & Songs Wiki)
3. Any updates on the Horrible Music & Songs Wiki bureaucrat election? You seem to be winning but you are not a bureaucrat yet. When do you plan to close the election and notify Stewards on Steward's noticeboard about the election?
4. Please read my blog about how to fix Rotten Websites Wiki since I feel I made some important points which may fix the wiki. The wiki cannot be shut down for reasons I mentioned in the blog.

A steward is reviewing the election. We'll have to be patient and see the result.

And also my other question about the mixed reception movies. Will the other negatively recieved movies on Greatest Movies Wiki like The Lego Ninjago Movie and Star Trek The Motion Picture be deleted? I saw that Tom and Jerry (2020) was moved to Awful Movies Wiki but what about the others?

Can you also delete these pages on Greatest Movies Wiki since most people hate them:

• The Lego Ninjago Movie
• Police Academy 2
• Police Academy 3
• Smurfs: The Lost Village
• Looney Tunes: Back in Action
• Space Jam
• The Black Cauldron

I checked the reviews for The Lego Ninjago Movie and Looney Tunes: Back in Action and most people actually like them so they will stay but the rest will be moved.

No, I have seen a lot of hate for The Lego Ninjago Movie. PhantomStrider considers it the worst Lego related movie, and it seems like fans also hate it and refuse to talk about it. It has a 56% critic rating and 46% audience rating on Rotten Tomatoes, a 55/100 rating on Metacritic, a 6.0/10 rating on IMDb, and a B+ rating on CinemaScore. It also did not do well at the box office.

So now the second point that I listed above still needs to be done.

Chris Stuckmann pointed out that the film is underrated and just because one reviewer thinks it's bad doesn't mean it should be on Awful Movies Wiki. Plus, 6.0/10 is still a decent score and a B+ is also a decent score as well.

Ok. We could do a poll then, because I have seen a lot of hate for the movie.

You're just getting yourself blocked on the games and movie reception wikis as well since you're already blocked on the TV show and websites wikis due to causing drama.

I'm sorry.

We can leave The Lego Ninjago Movie page alone then.

The second point I listed in the original post still has to get done though so that we can redesign the main pages for Magnificent Literature Wiki and Delightful Music & Songs Wiki.

Also one more thing, the words need to be bigger

What words?

You know The letters font on the wikis, delightful songs wiki needs the font bigger because it’s to small to read

What do you mean? The size looks alright to me.

Oh ok and be there at your message board I need to talk to you

Oh ok and be there at your message board I need to talk to you

@MarioMario456 can you please do the second thing on the list.

I think that the The Black Cauldron page should be kept, since audiences seem to like the film a lot and it has a cult following.

It has mixed reviews and was also a box-office bomb though.