User talk:Grand Albert

Jump to navigation Jump to search

About this board

Not editable

So I can't use the word, "idiot"?

1
Mar9122 (talkcontribs)

Since when that rule exist? Oh well, I guess antagonizing-- wait a minute? Angrybirdsfan has redeemed himself. Forget about that doofus him. lol

Anyways, I'll be more "genuine" in this wiki so I won't get banhammered myself. Thanks anyways.

EDIT: The reason why I said that word is that I just want to make fun of things.

Masson Thief (talkcontribs)
A gift for you
You are smart and handsome like a rat, Grand Albert! Masson Thief (talk) 14:58, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
Grand Albert (talkcontribs)

What a lovely rat! Thank you Masson Thief! Rats are the really smart ones, though, not me!

WENth100 (talkcontribs)

Now that's a nice one.

Grand Albert (talkcontribs)

I am glad you like rats, too! Mice are even cuter as they are smaller.

GethN7 (talkcontribs)

That's a cute rat.

Be proud, Albert, you don't bring shame to rodents like a certain UglyRat.

Glad to have you with us.

Grand Albert (talkcontribs)

Thank you. Same goes for you.

Of course that moron came to my mind, too. He now always does when I think of rats and that is a shame. In a way, though, since he was permanently banned on Rational Wikia, we can say that UglyRat is no more. How dared he to compare himself to rats... And I still do not understand why somebody would name himself after an animal the large majority of people unfortunately despise and ugly, too. It is like he wants to be hated or be disturbing for some reasons.

JustAlex93Mh (talkcontribs)
Grand Albert (talkcontribs)

I have nothing against fundamental Christianity if it is perpetuated without violence and hate, but if the site is so biased as you refer, the page can stay here. In addition, I think it is generally well-written except for something which leaves me dubious, a native English speaker would be useful to review the grammar of the page. There are not atrocious errors, though.

Pointer one and three on their own do not address a flaw, though, just their point of view; I would mention in them that the family-friendly or educational videogames to whom they give favourable reviews generally received low ratings by unbiased (very important) reviewers or sites, in order to show their reviews are biased, like in the pointer about bible games. Overall, I say the page is good enough but we need some more unbiased evidence in order to not fall into informal fallacies.

There are no older topics