Jump to navigation Jump to search
Hamzat213 is apologizing in the subreddit.
He has apologized multiple times and still breaks the rules. A whole incident of this happened on the Character Wikis. I would say that they have been given way to many second chances and proved themselves unwelcome.
Alright. I didn't knew he was on drama.
Ehh... I don't know. He's done a lot of things that made it difficult for me to give him another chance, so I'm not really sure about welcoming him back here.
BTW, I thought Hamzat was a male?
Also, what do the comments say on the subreddit? I need an app in order to access it, even with Incognito Mode on.
They said: "okay here is the reason why i posted communist propaganda on qualitipedia: it's because of the winter war memes in my head that why i was angry and posted social justice warriors in qualitipedia i am so sorry for doing that. i was just mad at winter war memes and i can't get them out of my head so that's why i posted communist propaganda"
I got that part, but I couldn't get to the 4 comments that other users made to it.
It was me asking where did they got banned, they said it was everywhere, and the final one was of me saying that I would tell DarkMatter. Another comment was of they repeating why they posted SJW on the Miraheze comments.
In the event that he is unblocked, let's just hope that he doesn't go back to making political comments (or makes political comments when talked to directly about this) otherwise he will likely stay persona non grata.
At least he's not creating sock accounts to evade his ban; that would've decreased his chances of getting unblocked even further.
At most this user could get a probation unblock on the wiki they were most active on to prove they have actual constructive edits to offer. Just an 'oh okay unblocked everywhere' move after they completely bungled their appeal already on Qualitipedia central would be a bit naive in my opinion.
I looked at his global account info and he actually has only one or two edits in total for each QP wiki, with the most edits being on Poland Ball Wiki, with 14, and not a QP wiki. It seems all he ever did was post political comments, and he made his account in April, 5 months ago. I think it's safe to say they aren't here to help build wikis.
His profile picture on Reddit already explains everything about what kind of person you're dealing with. Mappers/Countryballers are massively political (not including all of them, of course, but unfortunately it is a stereotype of this type of fanbase).
Due to the fact that my request for a new admin was successful, I would ask you to give the admin role in gaming wikis for Katsumi a.k.a. Upperdecker2562 (I gave the whole explanation in the blog post). I'm telling you, he has tremendous potential. —Allistayrian (💬) 14:45, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
I've seen dozens of sockpups in Recent Changes since August, and they all connect to UglyDolls, that god awful movie. May I ask; why did this start, who is the one behind all of this, and how did he grow a stigma towards you?
That's a good question: This was all because a user, -abigblueworld-, was globally locked, and the user kept creating new accounts over and over which some relate to UglyDolls or other nonsense. Honestly, it's been getting out of control for a while. --DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 16:13, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Sounds as though that this dudette's an obnoxious fanbrat who tries to force you to go along with whatever UglyDolls-related nonsense that she brings out, with the way that she wants you to play guessing games relating to the movie, and playing the victim when you block her.
There's a couple of users with a long history of account trolling for amusement, built on the place's long term drama. abigblueworld is the most prolific of them, though.
Wow. Thats quite the history. I have seen her ask Dark (or, as she likes to call him, "Darky") to do what she says, or else she won't stop. Those questions being
- Whats my favorite movie?
- Please make a screenie of this specific UglyDolls clip.
- Give me a reason why I'm banned!
Whats kinda ironic is that this makes her look even more lazy, considering that she is able to make screenies himself; but no, she just had to make "Darky" do it for no reason. Also, she was given the reason why she was banned multiple times, so shes pretty much doing this for no reason. D:
if you delete this comment you are really immature
It is precisely this comment that will make you a laughing stock. I'm glad I blocked you because you've gotten annoying and apparently you shouldn't be part of our wikis anymore.
you are really immature but you have to use your stupid administrator power that your friends gave it to you because you were nice to them, to get a person banned only if you change that change again, but don't worry, I understand how much it is I went to the Jun Miraheze to you administrators and also the people, you showed it to me in the face
Well, I would not be immature. but I decide to log out from Google until this tragedy (my Google account would be disabled after 11 days).
But I would still be around, but only in Miraheze until my 17th or 18th birthday.
Oh my god, another immature user insulting admins for no good reason... what's this world coming to?
Esta insultando a los Admins
i know, it was sarcasm lol (i had to make it more obvious)
i'm sorry for making a david baszucki hate page, it's just my personal opinion.
can i make a page with less opinionated pointers?
Yes, as long as the game in question is well-hated by gamers.
It's strongly suggested to start in sandbox and perhaps ask for someone to look it over, that way it is much stronger when it is put on the 'main' part of the wiki. To ensure it is 'well-hated', see review and reception scores since this is what gives the page strength to be on this wiki.
Apology on RWW
I'm afraid to say, but I have to apologize for insulting TigerBlazer. I obviously do not like the fact that TigerBlazer was promoted to admin, but I am forced to apologise for my opinion on him
I accept your appology. However, I will respond to what you have said because I really want you to know how I feel about this.
I problem with the RWW was that many of the pages were not related to the internet. On the same note, many of the pages about users shouldn't have been there in the first place as 1. They could have caused drama, 2. Critisising certain users is against the CoC, even with sources added, and 3. For te unrealted pages that are now deleted, that wiki is called the Rotten Websites Wiki, not the "Everything Wrong With The World Wiki" (Which was what it looked like before the overhaul.)
As for you accusing me of being "anti-free speech", that is not true in the slightest. As a matter of fact, free-speech is the reason why me and many other users began pointing out the flaws of the wikis and are why they are improving in the first place (The overhaul itself came from a blog I made on this wiki, right here.
Fianlly, have you ever heard of The Outcast Network, because those wikis used to be focused on users and groups and were deleted for the same reasons I pointed out above, so I'm making sure that wiki doesn't become like those wikis and shuts down.
I have heard of the Outcast Network's bad reputation multiple times, even before i created my miraheze account! Also, the CoC says that criticizing users with sources isn't a violation. Now, can you unblock me on the RWW since i apologized?
I have now unblocked you.
An apology for what I did on Terrible Shows & Episodes Wiki.
Did you read my messages about that?
Yes, and it's fine. As long as you don't do it again.
I will not do that ever again.
That's good to hear. As long as you've learned your lesson, that's all that counts.
Also, can you delete Pop Secret page on Terrible Shows and Episodes Wiki? It has very generic pointers.
Already deleted it as it had very weak pointers.
No more removing pages with "generic/underdetailed" pointers
This has been said already.
Please. I'm sick of this. This is getting old very quickly, because that's stupid and makes no sense. Can you please leave pages with small pointers alone in favor of expansion by editing? Allistayrian has already hit a new low, but thankfully, he's old news.
Example you removed: Auto Modellista
Dude, I would only remove pages if they have weak pointers, or barely has any content, or if it's vandalism.
Why remove pages with weak pointers while some of them have more detailed ones? And why do that when you can just edit to expand pointers?
I'm still mad that my Hareraiser page got removed, even though that page was already reviewed before getting deleted/moved to sandbox.
I'm just going to mark this as resolved, since I don't want my notifications to start blowing up.
Not really necessary.