This wiki has been closed following a Request for Comments. Please see this page for more information.

User talk:Blazikeye535

Jump to navigation Jump to search

About this board

Not editable

Money12123 (talkcontribs)

Could you please move (and by move I mean rename) this page to the mainspace? I think it's finished.
Note: This was originally on Raidarr's talk page before they resigned from their bureaucrat position.

Pierce Ng (talkcontribs)

Same thing with me because I cannot move or rename due to Purge being the only one shown in the "More" section? Also with the other Qualitipedia wikis please?

Money12123 (talkcontribs)

The move right is now exclusive to staff as a result of the success of this RFC.

Summary by Marxo Grouch

Note to Kiki2002: please stop pestering Blazikeye to add more categories. He's made it clear that we have enough categories for now. No means no.

Kiki2002 (talkcontribs)

Do you know any good ideas for new categories to add to Crappy Games Wiki?

Blazikeye535 (talkcontribs)

Did you not read what I said on my previous talk page? I cannot emphasize this enough; there is no need for anymore categories right now since we have enough of them as it is.

Frustrating games category

2
Summary by Blazikeye535

Big no. What is with you and wanting as many categories on these wikis as possible? A few hundred is more than enough.

Kiki2002 (talkcontribs)

Can I make a category for games that can frustrate their players for various reasons such as unfair difficulty, cumbersome controls, horrendous level design, annoying padding and sloppy mechanics?

SuperStreetKombat (talkcontribs)

I don't think that's necessary since the "Hard games" category already exists.

Ugly games category

4
Kiki2002 (talkcontribs)

Can I make a Category for games that have ugly graphics, for example, games on advanced consoles whose graphics resemble those of consoles several generations behind.

Blazikeye535 (talkcontribs)

Okay, I guess?

Zangler (talkcontribs)

To me this sounds a bit pointless. What's the point of remarking that characteristic in particular? If that's just a small aspect of games that's already explored in the articles, doesn't that mean there should be a category for "Bad controls", "Bad soundtracks", "Bad features" and so forth?

Blazikeye535 (talkcontribs)

There is the category about bad stories, but then again that's going over a far bigger aspect than something as simple as graphics. I'm not exactly all for a category for bad graphics anyways if my post above doesn't make that any more obvious.

MJ2003 (talkcontribs)

Have you seen every Mel Gibson movie?

DeciduousWater534 (talkcontribs)

Haven't seen a single movie of his.

MJ2003 (talkcontribs)

Oh.

Yonydesk (talkcontribs)

did it take you 8 months to process that answer

MJ2003 (talkcontribs)

Yeah, also, sorry about that.

Thank you for unblocking me here

3
Freighttrain (talkcontribs)

Hi Blazikeye and thank you again for unblocking me here, anyway I just wanted to let you know for future reference, that I only ever might become irate on topics such as Disney's inappropriate monopolistic behaviour, 'SJW' infiltration in the video game industry, RGB rainbow-lighting etc., basically stuff that I'm sure at least most of us here would agree is not good for the video game industry or entertainment media as a whole.

For an example you can see here where I am beginning to become a bit annoyed, by Kiki2002 as she not only praises Disney's mindless franchise-assimilation practises, but also speculates on how Disney could transmogrify Fox's Anastasia into one of their two-dimensional cookie-cutter Stepford bimbos, she also doesn't address any of the points I raised, and then accuses me of discriminating against 'Disney's acquired properties'... Before telling me to respect her opinion, as if I was trying to force her or something, despite the topic itself not really having any subjectivity to it.

So yeah you can tell she's a bit of a zealot to say the least, pretty disturbing for me to see and it's the first I've seen of it here, anyway I've been going over this same thing on the recent CGW talk page topic, about creating an article regarding company/franchise consolidation in the video game industry, though personally I think that Microsoft's purchase of ActiBliz was not indicative of a new trend, I really see it more as just Microsoft bailing out ActiBliz since they were in so much trouble, so I think it's only Disney's corporate leadership afflicted with that type of mindless greed, the other's seem to have at least a functional grasp of the fundamentals, regarding why monopolistic practices have no place in the entertainment media industry, which can literally only exist and be what it is with creative diversity and competing standards.

Blazikeye535 (talkcontribs)

Understood, I get the frustration with opinionated users as they tend to be some of the most troublesome users here, especially on the TV show wikis. I also apologize again for the blocking misunderstanding and I'm glad to know you're handling the misunderstanding well.

Freighttrain (talkcontribs)

Yes I've seen how some people react to being blocked, their psycho messages and how the effect can linger, as I always see those same guys who keep making new troll accounts here and keep getting blocked.

Anyway it's not that Kiki2002 was being opinionated, it's just that she is being subjective about a topic that is really objective, we've all seen what Disney did to Star Wars, and I know I don't want to see them mess around with any of my favourites from Fox, I'm mainly talking about the Alien and Predator franchises here, because God knows they've been messed with enough over the past decade or so as it is.

Hi, I want to blog a couple of my game reviews here

3
Freighttrain (talkcontribs)

Hi Blazikeye, I've seen you over on the FW wiki a couple of times where I keep my sci-fi blog, anyway I have a couple of game reviews I'd like to blog here, one of them being on that piece of Ewok shit Aliens: Fireteam Elite which I spent $100 AUD on for the preorder deluxe edition, and I'd just really like to put it where people would be more likely to look for this kind of thing, anyway could you confirm my profile here so I can create a userpage and post blogs, thank you.

Blazikeye535 (talkcontribs)

You’re now confirmed.

Freighttrain (talkcontribs)

Cool thanks dude, I've just had a look at your Pokemon Sword/Shield joke blog, and immediately I can tell we have in common the same hatred of low standards there lol, though personally I haven't been very impressed by what the franchise has been putting out since generation V, I've actually put together the beginnings of a fanmade Pokemon region based on New Zealand, (also known as Australia's Canada), aussie here btw, anyway I would love to know what you think of it, I've been having a lot of difficulty with even finding people to talk to about it, let alone collaborate with.

The recent undo from the GTA: TT - DE page

2
Chad The Gman (talkcontribs)

I saw your undo and explanation, which could say its "super" nitpicky, if you want called me doing for.

But I'm just pointed it out that if the developer who made this "remaster", just could retroactively renamed this remaster title in a post-3D universe era as it make sense in hindsight. Due the original trilogy was released in 2005, three years before the first of two (GTA IV) HD universe era games to come exist. So thus again, renamed it could work too.

Blazikeye535 (talkcontribs)

What about the game's cover? That will nullify any confusion. Not only that, this is the only thing that can be considered a trilogy in The Grand Theft Auto franchise.

I sure i not terrible category and it's authorized

9
Gamingiq7890 (talkcontribs)

Well, that's my category. It's Indonesia review, my home is Indonesia, and i suppose to make category. I not terrible category and it's authorized by me.

SuperStreetKombat (talkcontribs)

Sorry, but what are you trying to say?

Blazikeye535 (talkcontribs)

He's claiming that he's the only one who can make the category since he's Indonesian, and it can only be authorized by him despite not even being an admin.

Blazikeye535 (talkcontribs)

Did you read rule #13?

Gamingiq7890 (talkcontribs)

How to see rules? Yeah, i know rules.

Allistayrian (talkcontribs)

That explains a lot why you are ignoring the rules because... YOU DON'T KNOW THEY EVEN EXIST. It obviously was unauthorized as you didn't even asked admins to create such category.

Gamingiq7890 (talkcontribs)

Why so angrily? Well, otherwise, i sure sorry that's my fault, you seems angry to me, you don't be angry such thing. Pls, don't be angry. This is my fault, just fault by me. Sorry.

The Dunkman (talkcontribs)

He wasn't being angry, he was just saying that in caps due to being important.

DuchessTheSponge has retired from being an admin.

13
Summary by Allistayrian

Can we solve this topic? DarkMatterMan is a leader and there are no vacancies for a new admin.

ShawnTehLogoBoi (talkcontribs)

I am gonna have to take his place as an admin, because as it turns out, when I went on some of the other wikis on Miraheze, I found out his name was no longer there on the main pages.

Allistayrian (talkcontribs)

We're not looking for new admins right now, so don't even ask for it.

ShawnTehLogoBoi (talkcontribs)

Oh.

Raidarr (talkcontribs)

Strange how confidently you said "I am gonna take her place".

Maxkatzur (talkcontribs)

His major flaws were...

DarkMatterMan4500 (talkcontribs)

DuchessTheSponge is a boy, not a girl.

Maxkatzur (talkcontribs)

Oh, I forgot. He's a boy.

ShawnTehLogoBoi (talkcontribs)

Me too. I'm not really sure who's gonna be in charge of Qualitipedia.

Raidarr (talkcontribs)

At the moment (between a blog poll and a few other places) that would seem to be DarkMatterMan.

Maxkatzur (talkcontribs)

He left me blocked in RWW just because I deleted one of many categories: "Rotten Moments in Website History", because I thought it was an exaggeration, but websites can't be moments because they are not events. I'm deeply sorry for unfortunate implications about Rule 34. Yes, we all commited unfortunate implications. DuchessTheSponge had mediocre grasp of Miraheze's rules, such as negative portrayal of fetish art overall is "against Miraheze's guidelines", while it's actually not, it's just kink shaming. Rule 34 page on RWW, while manages to indeed deal with child pornography (worst thing ever), needs editing into... let's say, to avoid unfortunate implications it and I have commited.


Well, it feels like I'm learning from mistakes.

ShawnTehLogoBoi (talkcontribs)

He had a mediocre grasp of Miraheze's rules? What a bad idea!

King Dice (talkcontribs)