You're welcome to edit articles but you have to avoid putting opinionated points and don't write in rant form. That's why your edits are often undone.
Jump to navigation Jump to search
I said, you constantly make poor edits and stop stirring up this topic.
Can I at least say things like....Bland Boss battles, or how unbalanced the Difficulty Super Potus Trump is and all?
He also trying to re-add the reasons which they're already being deleted before.
Not to mention he whines like a baby whenever someone reverts his edits. Like dude, it's not our fault your edits are extremely nitpicking as hell. And if you really want to help out, I suggest changing that attitude of yours.
Ok first of all, they are not nit-picky in the slight-is, they are actually reasons to why these games suck (like the cheap bit near the end of Bubsy's first levels, or the lack of any real check points in Sonic Boom: Rise of Lyric), and second, this is a Wiki for everyone, not just one sertant type of person.
The problem is with the redaction, they're written in a rather unprofessional and opinionated way. The site is for everyone but there needs to be standards.
What do you mean by an "unprofessional and opinionated way"? And also what standards?
What's also unprofessional is the way you react. Making bias edits is one thing but throwing a temper tantrum over people reverting said edits is another. I don't think this is the place for you, buddy.
That wasn't a temper tantrum,a nd if it was, thats just me being very annoyed by this, some points that I make do make true.
"Hey, I have a question, nothing to major or anything.......DO YOU WANT ME TO HELP OUT THIS WIKI OR NOT?!?!" is the definition of a tantrum.
Some of your edits essentially read as "There's this thing that annoys just me", that's a nitpick.
Well I'm sorry, its not my fault that I'm use to the more freedom back in the Fandom Version of Awful Games Wiki, and how it feels like everything I do and add is a "Nitpick".
"freedom" doesn't mean ranting and poor writing.
What I mean is something like the Fandom version of Awful Games Wiki.
That has nothing to do with it.
Awful Games wiki? What "Awful Games Wiki"?
That was what Crappy Games Wiki was originaly called.
We need a rule about the rant style writing.
What does that mean?
Poor redaction that sounds like an angry youtuber yelling and also bold capital letters for the sake of sounding louder. Youtubers yell and rant but that doesn't mean you should, being annoyed at something also doesn't mean you can get angry.
Well again, I am very sorry about how I reacted and all, I'm just confused by how this "new" version of wiki works.
Nice gravedigging. And TyrantRex (thankfully) left from these wikis.
So what are we to do about this discussion?
What do you mean by that?
Well, TyrantUnderreactionRex done so many questionable things after he started to behave terrible. He thinks he's running the wikis by messing up articles, removing content by using "Wikipedia copy-pasting", "angry rant writing" and "overreaction" excuses, deleting pages for personal reasons, taking angry rants and Anti-SJW's way too seriously, and especially, messing up the "Get Woke, Go Broke" article from AGW and locked it until I unlocked it.
Well he's gone ain't he?
Uh.....ok I don't get it.
How did this page not get resolved 9 months ago?
Idk but he's blocked from here for his poor edits. For 3 days.
Wait ME? Why?
Constantly making poor edits is not allowed. Don't worry it only last three days.
But I don't make poor edits, i really don't.
Putting nitpicks and personal reasons are not allowed. t
There are no older topics