Battlefield V

From Crappy Games Wiki Uncensored
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Battlefield V
Battlefield V standard edition box art.jpg
This is why you shouldn't insult or alienate your audience.
Genre: First-person shooter
Platforms: Microsoft Windows
PlayStation 4
Xbox One
Release Date: November 20, 2018
Developer: EA DICEAGW
Publisher: Electronic Arts
Franchise: Battlefield
Previous Game: Battlefield 1AGW


Battlefield V is a First-person shooter game developed by EA DICEAGW and published by Electronic Arts on November 20, 2018. It is the sixteenth installment in the Battlefield series.

Plot

Enter mankind's greatest conflict with Battlefield V as the series goes back to its roots with a never-before-seen portrayal of World War II.

Why It Sucks

  1. The game takes place during World War II, but it is extremely inaccurate historical-wise, taking away the feeling of playing a WW2 game and in a way is even being very disrespectful towards those who were involved in World War II. Examples include:
    • The most notorious example is a female soldier with a prosthetic arm who was one of the focuses of the game's reveal trailer, more info about that can be found here.
    • The story missions are all horrendously rewritten with SJW-pandering in mind: one mission replaces a team of male Norwegian commandos with a woman from Norwegian Resistance and her daughter, one acts like the British SBS would recruit a criminal, and a third adds a bunch of modern-day race politics to black Senegalese soldiers serving in the French military, despite the fact that France at the time was not even THAT racially prejudiced like some other countries were (it is true that Senegalese soldiers did experience some prejudice, unfair treatment and discrimination, but the game does exaggerate certain aspects).
    • Some cosmetics for British Army say "For The Queen", even though United Kingdom at that time was ruled by King George VI, not Queen Elizabeth II.
    • Swastika is censored even in the campaign. In fact, German soldiers are never even refered to as "nazis".
    • Many weapons that were used in WWII are absent, such as the M1 Garand, one of the most iconic guns of the war.
    • None of the well-known battles of WWII appear and there is also a serious lack of factions in the multiplayer.
  2. The campaign mode is very short, repetitive and easy.
  3. After the backlash for the lack of historical accuracy, Patrick Söderlund (EA's vice president at the time) called the critics "uneducated," gave a stupid justification about his daughter and said that if they gamers had two choices, either accept it or don't buy it, apparently many choose the latter.
  4. Bugs and glitches are common.
  5. Cheaters are becoming more and more common on PC.
  6. Character progression is terrible. The player has to spend in-game credits to unlock items, but the amount of credits the player receives is too low, forcing the player to do unnecessary grinding.
  7. Subtitles and other text that appear on the UI can be difficult to read as the text is usually on a white background, which is the same color font as the text.
    • This problem is particularly annoying when a character is speaking a foreign language.
  8. It can take a while to get into matches due to the low player-base.
  9. Ridiculously low amount of health, which gives players little to no reaction time when they are being attacked by an enemy player.
  10. The game lacks the chaos and brutality of war that Battlefield 1 had. Examples:
    • In Battlefield 1, if a match was going poorly, characters would panic and scream out in distress (crying for their mother, begging the enemy to stop shooting, swearing, etc). Battlefield V does not feature any of this.
    • Melee animations seem more toned down in comparison.
    • It is not allowed to finish off the wounded players from the enemy teams in the multiplayer, due to "Geneva Convention", which is just a really poor excuse (especially considering how heavily historically inaccurate the game is).
  11. Speaking of Battlefield 1, the game doesn't even have neat extras such as Codex Entries, which gave a lot of interesting information on various events, battles, weapons etc.
  12. Only eight maps are available, which is low when compared to other first-person shooters. Making matters worse is that many maps are set in locations where the British and the Germans NEVER crossed swords, like Rotterdam or Narvik.
  13. Player spawning is broken in most of the maps, especially the map "Hamada", where players in planes can bomb all of the opposing team's vehicles seconds after the match starts.
  14. Squads can only have up to four members instead of six like older Battlefield games.
  15. Parts of the game weren't available at release, most likely due to the game being rushed. This includes:
    • Game modes "Tides of War" and "practice range".
    • One of the campaign's war stories called "The Last Tiger".
    • A bunch of customization options, especially for tanks.
    • The Battle Royale mode was delayed until March 2019.
  16. Character classes are unbalanced, as weapon selection is overly-restricted.
    • Medics are completely pointless because not only are they under-powered, other classes can also revive players.
  17. The screams that male characters make are hilariously bad, to the point where they sound like a woman screaming.
  18. Lighting tends to be too bright at times, making the graphics look washed out.
  19. The heavily hyped ray-tracing graphics option on the PC version tanks performance to virtually unplayable levels, while only offering very slightly nicer reflections in return. At first this was assumed to be the result of nVidia's then-new GeForce RTX cards just not being powerful enough to do the technology justice, but later games such as Metro: Exodus have used it for vastly improved graphics at similar or better performance compared to this game, making it obvious that DICE just did an extremely poor job of implementing it.
  20. Despite many requests, the game lacks a feature to turn off historically inaccurate character customization for those who want a more authentic WW2 experience. While DICE still claims that this is everyones Battlefield.

Redeeming Qualities

  1. Combat is still good.
  2. The maps "Aerodrome" and "Twisted Steel" are fun to play on.
  3. Aside from the bad lighting, the graphics are great.
  4. Sound design is good.
  5. All DLC is free, and the only microtransactions are for cosmetics.
  6. While easy, campaign missions are now less linear, and there are multiple play-styles to use.
  7. The additional War Story, The Last Tiger, allows you to play as Germans and shows that not all German soldiers were actually nazis and bad people, which is very rare for a WW2 game, even though it's pretty watered down. It is also arguably the best chapter in the campaign.
  8. Many of the worst bugs have been fixed, even though some bugs remain.
  9. Finding games is much easier nowadays.
  10. Animations (apart from a few bugs of course) are exceedingly well done.
  11. Despite the numerous historical inaccuracies and SJW-pandering, some of the war stories cover more obscure aspects of World War II, like the Tirailleurs Sénégalais.
  12. DICE hasn't given up on this game despite the initial turmoil, and they have (for the most part) listened to player feedback. They promised to bring new maps, and a new campaign set in Pacific Theatre later in 2019.

Reception

Despite mostly positive reviews from critics and some fans, it was heavily criticized by fans of older Battlefield games. Many game reviewers also have opinions ranging from mixed to negative. AngryJoe gave it a 5/10 and later listed it as number 5 in his top 10 most disappointing games of 2018 video, Along with Fallout 76. The user scores on Metacritic are 2.8/10 for PC, 2.2/10 for PS4, and 2.7/10 for Xbox One.[1][2][3]

Reports have indicated that the game had an even worse debut week than Battlefield: Hardline, which had been generally considered the worst game in the series until this one came along, further reinforced by retailers in the US discounting the game at 50% after just a week after launch. Possible factors for the low sales may include the underwhelming reveal, terrible teaser event with Trevor Noah, EA and DICE's mistake in attacking disgruntled fans, unimpressive beta and YouTube reactionaries slamming the game using strawman arguments. EA lost around $350 million because of Battlefield V's launch.[4]

Videos

References


avatar

JaguarByte Productions

10 months ago
Score 3
I knew this was going here. Fuck SJWs.
avatar

Grust

10 months ago
Score 5
Want to know what's really pathetic? EA is still insulting gamers after this flopped and are using our complaints about it at the launch party in Sweden. They've already doubled down once before with the uneducated remark, but this is quadrupling.
avatar

WENth100

10 months ago
Score 5

Sorry EA, I'm too uneducated to download your 7-day trial and cannot comprehend the concepts of "discount".


Seriously, I'm not gonna bother with this, I was never a fan of online-focused games and downloading this game with electricity is wasteful.
avatar

Grust

10 months ago
Score 3
I'm pretty much done with online only games too.
avatar

TaakoManTheGameMaster

10 months ago
Score 1
Okay, I'm okay with representation in games, but, if you want to add diversity to a game based on a historical event, at least make it historically accurate! What I think they should've done with the female playable character gig instead of the inaccurate and pandering-reeking stuff in the final game is make a War Stories campaign centered on the women who served in the Soviet Union's military in WWII. That way, people who want to see female soldiers in a Battlefield game can get their wish while players who want their games to be accurate can still enjoy it.
avatar

TaakoManTheGameMaster

10 months ago
Score 2
If you wanna read up on the roles of Soviet women in the military: https://en.w...World_War_II
avatar

Evil Tim

10 months ago
Score 1
Yeah, like a flying level where you're playing as a pilot with the Night Witches would have been awesome.
avatar

Unnamedgoon

10 months ago
Score 1
Y'all saw that coming.
avatar

Pinky Malinky

10 months ago
Score -2
Not fair! If Battlefield V is on here, then so should Call of Duty: Black Ops 4!
avatar

CyanFire

7 months ago
Score 2
Except Black Ops 4 is tolerable to some and doesn't have much in the way of controversy that the other games in the series don't already have, but to go from Battlefield 1 to this earns it a spot on this wiki.
avatar

DNIguy64

10 months ago
Score 0
So which FPS shooter is the worst of 2018 Battlefield V or Black Ops 4?
avatar

Xian Pu

10 months ago
Score 0
Of those two, Battlefield V by a long shot. Black Ops IIII is an otherwise solid game that's only let down by slightly outdated graphics and not really being worth full retail price.
avatar

Pinky Malinky

9 months ago
Score -1
Black Ops 4. Enough said.
avatar

DNIguy64

8 months ago
Score 1
Well in Black ops 4's defense, Activision was at least merciful enough to give out the season passes maps for free in a limited time offer, and has a battle royale mode at launch.
avatar

Pinky Malinky

9 months ago
Score 0
Honestly, I can't tell if this game is historically inaccurate because I suck at history class. :(
avatar

Xian Pu

9 months ago
Score 0
Apparently, despite the game selling more than Hardline in its debut week it's now on-course to outsell that one in the longer term. Which will probably be enough for EA to claim it sold okay.
avatar

Dreadblocks

8 months ago
Score 0
Battlefield: Hardline should be on this wiki.
avatar

Z Grand GR

6 months ago
Score 0
deserved fail ea
avatar

Subzero967

6 months ago
Score 0
sjws are a scourge to mankind that must be purged from this world in god's name and will be crushed under the foot of the people
avatar

Wtfrichard

4 months ago
Score -3
As someone who actually played the game, Battlefield V has improved and will continue to improve. The reveal of Tides of War: Defying the Odds promises four (count them) new maps, a Operation: Metro remake, the Pacific theater and new weapons (such as the Welrod and bazooka as seen in the trailer) and DICE Los Angeles working on it. The "SJWs reeeee" argument is and always was horseshit. Again I've actually played the damn game unlike you people who probably watched your favorite conservative YouTube idiot complain about how there's a woman in his vidya.
avatar

Seanbuscus2600

3 months ago
Score 2

Kid, you clearly don't understand and probably didn't even read the article whatsoever. You may be right about the game improving, but it doesn't change how EA responded to the criticism in the first place. It was bad enough when they pandered to SJWs but when they insulted and alienated their fanbase about it, they pushed themselves in a deeper hole as usual. Let's also not forget that YouTube critics are much less corrupt and actually discuss the real problem in certain topics, like the Battlefront II controversy. Also I'm pretty sure some of us have tried it already, so don't assume that we judge a book by its' cover.

Overall your argument is mostly invalid other than the improvement here and there. Between you and me, I think we both know who's false. Nice try.
avatar

JDM4678

21 days ago
Score 0
I find it pretty weird since,if its titled Battlefield 5,why it does not take place in the modern time,we all know that generic FPS games are hated(most of them)but seriously?

You are not allowed to post comments.