Blog:About the character reception wikis

Deleting the character reception wikis was a very dumb idea to begin with it, while those wikis had flaws deleting them wasn't necesary, as there were good articles on those wikis, if some admin can restore it, please do it so we can fix what is wrong with those wikis.

=Now I will criticize TigerBlazer's blog post's pionters.=

"They don't fit with the "Reception" theme of the wikis"
Just because characters are not reviewed by "professional" critics like shows, movies and video games does not mean that we can't criticize them, there are many characters that are praised by critics and audiences alike and had a great impact on the entertainment industry, and other characters are very depised by many persons, and we need to explain why. also, this wiki has articles for obscure bootleg games that were not reviewed by professional critics (or at least not in the west).

"Almost all of the pages there are biased, making biased pages is very easy, and the wiki is taken way to seriously"
While there were some mediocre/bad, not all the pages on those wikis were biased, there were pages which had valid criticisms towards the characters, and there were also pages about characters that are very depised by many, such as Jar Jar Binks, and there were also pages about characters from media that have articles on the negative reception wikis, heck, even good shows have bad characters, and LCW proves it, plus, there is nothing wrong with criticizing intentionally bad characters, people should know why those characters are bad and this wiki does have articles for some intentionally bad games, but no one freaks out about it.

"Heroes/Villains Wikis already did this concept"
No, those wikis are absolutely different, they are databases for heroes and villains and unlike the reception wikis, they are not focused on criticizing the characters, they talk about their heroic/villainous actions instead and do not point out the good qualities nor the flaws of those characters like the reception wikis do, plus the structure of the articles of those wikis are completely different.

"Even if we do attempt to fix these wikis, they will be in very bad shape"
Don't be so lazy, we can make those wikis to be better as we can fix or remove the biased articles like in the other wikis, this wiki (and the other reception wikis) also has some bad or mediocre articles, and we need to make more quality control. The Great/Incredible Characters was better than Loathsome Characters Wiki as it had less biased pages as it was focused on positive criticism, hence the name.

I think the character reception wikis should be restored so we can improve them and become much more active and positive as persons, even if we need to do other things, and please do not cause any kind of drama with this blog post.