Blog:My debunks on criticism of Qualitipedia

This is my blog debunking the criticism towards the criticism.


 * 1) "They treat stuff like Cuties and The Emoji Movie like The Worst Things ever!": First off, these movies (though, mainly Cuties) have the rights to get these treatments because
 * 2) Cuties is a real pedo-bait that wasn't made by any unknown company, but it was made by Netflix. This actually shocked me and although, it didn't convince me to cancel my subscription, it's a terrible idea to do this.
 * 3) "They put stuff that is well-received on wikis that talk about stuff that received negative reviews": The main reason why criticism say that is because they often rely on Rotten Tomatoes, which is actually unreliable due to it being often victim of vote brigading, as well the reviews being mostly stale (which made me question why it's forbidden on Rotten Websites Wiki)
 * 4) There's a wiki called Tiresome Wikis made on ShoutWiki, which was a wiki to criticize wikis, Qualitipedia wikis are there too, but the pages related to those are arguably the most biased and most nitpicky pages i've ever seen. No joke.
 * 5) Rather than focusing on other bad stuff, like the poor choices of pages of the wikis main pages, the criticism focused exclusively on bad community and biased agenda, which is something that is heavily milked to this day.