Blog:Debunking our SephSpace article

We discovered our SephSpace article about us. SephSpace is private, though I've been sent screenshots of the article. A lot of it is lies or bias, so this will help in debunking the article.

'''Note that this is an older version of the article. If someone can send me the source code for the latest version of the page, that would be awesome.'''

This is a work in progress, check back regularly for more content.

Legend
SS: SephSpace DB: Debunk

Why They Suck
SS: "To get the rabbit out of the hat, what's the point of having wikis to criticize and praise good things when are already websites for that, such as Metacritic, Rotten Tomatoes, and IMDb?" DB: We know that these three sites exist, but we want to have a wiki that explains the reason why these pieces of media are good or bad, so the existence of these wikis is justified. BTW some critics are corrupted.

SS: "However, they get very butthurt that those websites do not reflect their opinions, and even put the latter two on Rotten Websites Wiki." DB: We discovered that these were hate pages and we later deleted them. So, this is outdated.

SS: "Their purpose is also poorly executed due to it being used in the hands of people who are needlessly rough when they hate something." DB: There's a reason why we're called the "reception wikis" and not the "opinion wikis". So, we delete these biased pages when we discover them.

SS: "They put highly reviewed games, movies and TV shows into the negative wikis regardless if they're actually good or not, just for personal and/or biased reasons (ex. The critics are snobs.) For example, they put Super Mario 3D All-Stars on Crappy Games Wiki even though the game was well received and is nowhere near bad. Adding onto that, they even gatekept said page." DB: We have since deleted Super Mario 3D All-Stars from this wiki and plan to recreate it on Awesome Games, so, outdated. Plus, we have a long way to delete these biased pages.

SS: "The Hellboy (2019) page is literally filled with reasons literally criticizing it for being too dark. It's R-rated, what do you expect?" DB: This is biased nonsense. If you go to Metacritic and IMDb, you can see that it got mixed to negative reviews.

SS: "These wikis claim to be wikis about legitimate information, but in reality, they are actually a hive-minded echo chamber." DB: While some users have hive-minds, there is no proof that our wikis are actually an echo chamber. So, we'll have to dismiss this as a lie.

SS: "They give out no citations or sources to back up their claims, which not only means that their claims are bullshit but make them seem like accusations as well." DB: Most pages on the seven mainline wikis contain videos, sources, and a reception section to add credibility to the page. Whatever page lacks any sources, they usually get deleted. Furthermore, we do not allow any unsourced pages about IRL people or groups as the lack of sources for those types of pages violate Miraheze's Content policy.

SS: "They are very anti-free speech, as they don't allow blogs that criticize them or even memes." DB: ♪ Little lies, little sweet little lies! ♪ You will see blogs that criticize our wikis and memes.

SS: "The infamous Celebtards page. Not helping is that Grust originally intended it to be a page about celebrities going SJW (hence its original name, Celebrities Go SJW), but has since been twisted to be about dumb things celebrities have done in general." DB: Whoops, you put this pointer in the wrong section!

SS: "They can't handle people who disagree with them." DB: We have been reading the Reception Wikis article on The New Reception Wiki and Grust's blogs in order to improve.

SS: "Street hooligan violates the Code of Conduct because it is an insult." DB: Have you not even Googled "hooligan"? If "hooligan" was an insult, we would have already been warned by a steward long ago.

SS: "DeciduousWater534 makes some of the most unfunniest jokes." "Is the true mastermind behind the Inkster controversy since it all started when he made a "joke" blog about Pokémon Sword and Shield on CGW. He also abuses his power for his own personal gain, and infamously added said games to CGW because he hates them and to piss Inkster off." DB: If his jokes are so "unfunny", then how come his comments and blogs receive plenty of upvotes? The joke blog itself caused no drama whatsoever aside from Inkster wanting it deleted for no good reason. If the controversy really started from this blog (which it didn't), then it was Inkster who started the fiasco for edit warring, not DeciduousWater534. How exactly does he abuse his powers? There isn't any proof to back those claims up. He also stated in the past that he personally likes Pokémon Sword and Shield, but doesn't think they're good games. If he truly hated Pokémon Sword and Shield, then he wouldn't have allowed them to be moved back to AGW (he originally added the games to AGW, further proving that he doesn't hate Pokémon Sword and Shield).

SS: "When an article you created is featured and you want to delete it, there's a good chance they won't delete the page for you." DB: Then explain why Super Mario 3D All-Stars was deleted.

SS: "The stewards dislike these wikis, as some of them pointed out their frequent Content Policy violations." DB: That's a broad assumption, no? While it's true that they have warned us about violations of the Content Policy on a few occasions, the stewards are on generally good terms with the Qualitipedia user base, with a few admins such as DarkMatterMan4500 regularly helping out the stewards.

SS: "When they found this page, they went full YandereDev mode and played the victim card." DB: This proves that your wiki is the biggest piece of shit I've ever seen, and that you guys can't even take criticism. This isn't playing the victim card, you are being trolls and falsely accusing us. This also proves your community is worse than Kiwi Farms.